De pagina ververst bij het selecteren van een onderwerp.
Sla artikel navigatie over.A number of the ARC Fund’s accounting policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair value has been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. When applicable, further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.
The ARC Fund’s portfolio is appraised every quarter by external, independent appraisal companies having appropriate recognised professional qualifications and recent experience in the location and category of property (residential real estate) being appraised.
The fair values are based on market values, being the estimated amount for which a property could be exchanged on the date of the appraisal between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably.
In the absence of current prices in an active market, the appraisals are prepared by considering the actual rental value of the property. A market yield is applied to the actual rental value to arrive at the gross property valuation.
Appraisals reflect, when appropriate, the type of tenants actually in occupation or responsible for meeting lease commitments or likely to be in occupation after letting vacant accommodation, the allocation of maintenance and insurance responsibilities between the ARC Fund and the tenant, and the remaining economic life of the property.
When rental reviews or lease renewals are pending with anticipated reversionary increases, it is assumed that all notices, and when appropriate counter-notices, have been served validly and within the appropriate time.
The Fund Manager has established a control framework with respect to the measurement of fair values.
This includes real estate analysts who have overall responsibility for overseeing all significant fair value measurements, including Level 3 fair values, and report directly to Fund Management.
The real estate analysts regularly review significant unobservable inputs and valuation adjustments and assess the evidence obtained from the external independent appraisers to support the conclusion that such valuations meet the requirements of IFRS, including the level in the fair value hierarchy in which such valuations should be classified.
Significant valuation issues are reported to the Fund Management.
When measuring the fair value, the company uses observable market data as much as possible. Fair values are categorised into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1: valuation on the basis of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2: values based on (external) observable information.
Level 3: values based wholly or partially on non (external) observable information.
If the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or a liability might be categorised at different levels of the fair value hierarchy, then the fair value measurement is categorised at its level of the fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement. The company recognises transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period during which the change has occurred.
Further information about the assumptions made in measuring fair values is included in the table below.
EUR X 1,000 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
2023 | |||
Investment property, assets held for sale and assets under construction | - | - | 4,311,928 |
EUR X 1,000 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
2022 | |||
Investment property, assets held for sale and assets under construction | - | - | 4,411,193 |
Valuation technique | Significant unobservable input | Inter-relationship between key unobservable inputs and fair value measurement |
Investment property, assets held for sale and assets under construction | ||
The appraisal has to be carried out using the ‘Rental Value Capitalisation’ (BAR/ NAR) method which must be confirmed with the outcome of a ‘Discounted Cash Flow’ method including the ‘reletting’ scenario and the ‘unit based sale’ scenario. The Fund Manager has decided that the appraisal has to be carried out using both methods to ensure that the appraisal is as accurate as possible. | Rental Value Capitalisation (BAR/NAR) | The estimated fair value carried out using the Rental Value method (BAR/NAR) would increase (decrease) if: |