Ga naar artikel navigatie Ga naar inhoud

4 Determination of fair value

A number of the AL&C Fund’s accounting policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value, for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair value has been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. When applicable, further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.

(i) Investment property / assets under construction

The AL&C Fund’s portfolio is appraised every quarter by external, independent appraisal companies having appropriate recognised professional qualifications and recent experience in the location and category of property (residential real estate) being appraised. The fair values are based on market values, being the estimated amount for which a property could be exchanged on the date of the appraisal between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably.

In the absence of current prices in an active market, the appraisals are prepared by considering the actual rental value of the property. A market yield is applied to the actual rental value to arrive at the gross property valuation.

Appraisals reflect, when appropriate, the type of tenants actually in occupation or responsible for meeting lease commitments or likely to be in occupation after letting vacant accommodation, the allocation of maintenance and insurance responsibilities between the AL&C Fund and the tenant, and the remaining economic life of the property.

When rental reviews or lease renewals are pending with anticipated reversionary increases, it is assumed that all notices, and when appropriate counter-notices, have been served validly and within the appropriate time.

The Fund Manager has established a control framework with respect to the measurement of fair values. This includes real estate analysts who have overall responsibility for overseeing all significant fair value measurements, including Level 3 fair values, and who report directly to Fund Management.

The real estate analysts regularly review significant unobservable inputs and valuation adjustments and assess the evidence obtained from the external independent appraisers to support the conclusion that such valuations meet the requirements of IFRS, including the level in the fair value hierarchy in which such valuations should be classified.

Significant valuation issues are reported to the Fund Management.

When measuring the fair value, the company uses observable market data as much as possible. Fair values are categorised into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:

Level 1: valuation on the basis of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2: values based on (external) observable information.

Level 3: values based wholly or partially on non (external) observable information.

If the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or a liability might be categorised in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, then the fair value measurement is categorised in its level of the fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement. The company recognises transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period during which the change has occurred.

Further information about the assumptions made in measuring fair values is included in Table Valuation techniques on page 43.

C. Fair value hierarchy to reflect the level of judgment involved in estimating fair values

(EUR x 1,000)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

2022

   

Investment property and assets under construction

  

453,701

    

(EUR x 1,000)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

2021

   

Investment property and assets under construction

  

379,196

(Level 1: quoted prices; Level 2: market observables; Level 3: unobservable)

D. Valuation techniques used in measuring level 2 and level 3 Fair values as well as unobservable inputs used

Valuation technique

Significant unobservable input

Inter-relationship between key unobservable inputs and fair value measurement

Investment property

The appraisal has to be carried out using the ‘Rental Value Capitalisation’ (BAR/NAR) method which must be confirmed with the outcome of a ‘Discounted Cash Flow’ method including the ‘reletting’ scenario and the ‘unit based sale’ scenario. The Fund Manager has decided that the appraisal has to be carried out using both methods to ensure that the appraisal is as accurate as possible.

Rental Value Capitalisation (BAR/NAR)
• cash flows estimated on the basis of market rent;
• allowable deductions for owners charges in line with market conditions;
• capitalisation at net initial yields (minus purchasing costs payable by the purchaser) of similar transactions;
• adjusting entries for (initial) vacancy, overdue maintenance and future renovations.

Discounted Cash Flow
• an estimated average increase in value of vacant possession, the rent and the operating costs;
• a property specific rental turnover rate;
• the exit value, which is the estimated realisable value at the end of the review period;
• the estimated yield (mosty recent 10-year government bonds, plus a risk premium).

The estimated fair value carried out using the Rental Value (BAR/NAR) method would increase (decrease) if:
• cash flows estimated on the basis of market rent were higher (lower);
• allowable deductions for owners charges in line with market conditions were lower (higher);
• capitalisation at net initial yields (minus purchasing costs payable by the purchaser) of similar transactions were lower (higher);
• adjusting entries for (initial) vacancy, overdue maintenance and future renovations were lower (higher).


The estimated fair value carried out using the Discounted Cash Flow method would increase (decrease) if:
• an estimated average increase in value of vacant possession is higher (lower), the rent is higher (lower) and the operating costs are lower (higher);
• a property specific rental turnover rate is lower (higher);
• the exit value, which is the estimated realisable value at the end of the review period is higher (lower);
• the estimated yield (mosty recent 10-year government bonds, plus a risk premium) is lower (higher).

Assets under construction

Amounts invoiced by development party based on progress of assets under construction. Contractual construction price is based on an orderly transaction between market participants at contract date. Lead time on projects is relatively short and objects are distinctive. As long as construction was not finished, invoiced amounts represent best estimate of the fair value of assets under construction.

Impact of market conditions is assumed to be limited

The estimated fair value would increase (decrease) if:
• market conditions for similar objects improve (decrease) during construction.